What could possibly make magic or spells fail to work for someone?

My answer to What could possibly make magic or spells fail to work for someone?

Answer by Alex Sumner:

(A2A) A lot of fluffy-bunny new-agey type magic folk are not going to like my answer, but what the hell, here it goes:

The primary cause of spell-failure is because the magician has tacked a “an it harm none” clause onto the end of his or her spell-intention. Then, when the spirits who have been charged with causing the spell-result to manifest calculate that the only possible way of success is in fact by hurting someone, they are forced to give it up as a bad job.

The idea of a “an it harm none” clause comes mainly from Wicca, which I believe was a ploy by Gerald Gardner to make his brand of witchcraft seem respectable, although I have seen similar practices in other magical traditions. In each of them, including Wicca, the idea of adding the “an it harm none” clause is taught quite dogmatically.

In my experience, far more success tends to happen if instead of specifying “harm none,” one says “and no *innocent* person shall be harmed.” This has the added bonus of creating some hilarious scenes, although obviously not all the people involved will find it amusing. 😉

What could possibly make magic or spells fail to work for someone?

3 Comments

Filed under Supernatural

3 responses to “What could possibly make magic or spells fail to work for someone?

  1. V.e.L.V.X.

    I love this explanation. I generally use something like, “with no harm to my family, or to anyone of good will.” I know some will disagree, but I feel that if I am acting with good intention and it results in some adverse effect for a bad-willed person, I have been an unwitting instrument of tikune for that person. I think this is district from deciding someone in particular deserves something in particular for something they did that I’ve decided is wrong and sending consequences their way – in other words, issuing a curse – which could generate negative consequences for the issuer of the curse.

  2. What you said about spells not working made sense. But would you consider “for the greater good” to be a clause that prevents spells from working?

    • I would not use such phrase myself. So many criminals have used it to justify the most monstrous acts throughout history that for attempting to limit a spell’s effects would be meaningless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s